Abuse of try and catch in exception handling

I have seen in some real life code that people sometimes use C++ for their convinience. Rather than solving the problem using powerful C++ features, they take dodgy shortcuts. Here is an example of peice of code that shows this abuse with 2 possible solutions.

//Program tested on Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 - Zahid Ghadialy
//This example shows how some people abuse throw and catch 

#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
//
//The following interface is defined and being used by many classes
void function1();
//Now some programmer wants to change this to
//int function1();
//But this is not possible since overloading does not work for return types
//
//The same problem could instead be solved by other approach as follows:
void function1(int &abc);
int function1(int dummy1, int dummy2); /*Note 2 dummy to avoid ambiguity with
                    the first overload. If the above overloaded func was not 
                    there then only 1 dummy is sufficient 
*/

int main()
{
  try
  {
    function1();
  }
  catch(int xyz)
  {
    cout<<"\n\n";
    cout<<"The function1() returned "<<xyz<<endl;
    cout<<"\n\n";
  }
  
  int first;
  function1(first);
  cout<<"The 1st overloaded function1() returned "<<first<<endl;
  cout<<"\n\n";

  cout<<"The 2nd overloaded function1() returned "<<function1(3,4)<<endl;
  cout<<"\n\n";

  return 0;
}

void function1()
{
  //function logic
  throw 100;
}

//Overloaded function1()
void function1(int &abc)
{
  abc = 120;
}

//Overloaded function1()
int function1(int dummy1, int dummy2)
{
  return 140;
}

The output is as follows: