BOOL to bool

I faced a very simple problem the other day. The compiler started generating a warning:

warning C4800: 'int' : forcing value to bool 'true' or 'false' (performance warning)

The reason being that because I was including some Windows file that included windef.h. In windef.h, it says: typedef int BOOL;

What I was trying to do was to cast that BOOL to bool. Of course we can suppress the warning easily by the #pragma directives as discussed earlier but there has to be a better and a simpler way. Then it clicked, how about a simple != 0 comparison. Here is the sample code:

//Program tested on Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 - Zahid Ghadialy
#include<iostream>
#include<windows.h>
#include<windef.h>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
  BOOL someVal = 1;

  bool firstApproach = someVal; //Generates warning C4800
  cout<<"firstApproach = "<<firstApproach<<endl;

  bool secondApproach = (someVal != 0); //No Warning
  cout<<"secondApproach = "<<secondApproach<<endl;

  return 0;
}

Catching the 'Divide By Zero' exceptions

I was surprised to find that C++ does not catch divide by 0 exceptions by default. The code will crash when a divide by 0 situation occurs. As a result the only option is to write our own class or method to handle divide by 0 scenario. The example below shows how to handle the Divide by zero scenario and how to construct an exception.

//Program tested on Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 - Zahid Ghadialy
#include<iostream>

using namespace std;

class Division
{
public:
  double quotient(int numerator, int denominator);
private:

};

double Division::quotient(int numerator, int denominator)
{
  if(!denominator)
  {
    exception e("Divide by 0 exception");
    throw(e);
  }
  return (static_cast< double >( numerator ))/denominator;
}


int main()
{
  Division d;
  try
  {
    cout<<"1. (100/10) = "<<d.quotient(100, 10)<<endl;
    cout<<"2. (10/4) = "<<d.quotient(10, 4)<<endl;
    cout<<"3. (10/0) = "<<d.quotient(10, 0)<<endl;
    cout<<"4. (30/9) = "<<d.quotient(30, 9)<<endl;
  }
  catch(exception& e)
  {
    cout<<"Exception caught with cause :"<<e.what()<<endl;
  }
  return 0;
}

The output is as follows:

You can read more on this topic here.

Using constants with functions

There always seems to be confusion in using const with functions. I am not referring to const functions that have const after the function name, that is straightforward. Also, the way functions behave when you have const before them is different than the built-in types. I have earlier provided a table for that.

Here is a simple program that shows different types of const with functions.

//Program tested on Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 - Zahid Ghadialy
#include<iostream>
#include<string>

using namespace std;

class A
{
public:
  int x;
};

class B
{
public:
  string y;
};

A* const createA()
{
  return (new A);
}

const B* createB()
{
  return (new B);
}

int main()
{
  A* a = NULL;
  a = createA();
  a->x = 100;
  cout<<"a.x = "<<a->x<<endl;
  delete a;

  const B* b = NULL;
  b = createB();
  //b->y = "Hello"; - Compilation error because b is constant
  (const_cast<B*>(b))->y = "Hello";
  cout<<"b.y = "<<b->y<<endl;
  delete b;

  A* const a2 = NULL;
  //a2 = createA(); - Compilation Error: 
                   // you cannot assign to a variable that is const

  A* const a3 = new A; //not possible to change what a3 points to now
  a3->x = 23456;
  cout<<"a3.x = "<<a3->x<<endl;
  delete a3;
  
  return 0;
}

The output is as follows:

Input/Output with files

The following is a simple program to show reading, writing and appending to files. You can read more about this feature at cplusplus.com.

//Program tested on Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 - Zahid Ghadialy
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
  string line;
  cout<<"\nFile 1 operations - Writing to Hello.txt"<<endl;
  ofstream file1; //OUTPUT file Stream
  file1.open("Hello.txt"); //Open the file
  file1 << "Writing something something to a file"<<endl;
  file1 << "This is enough for the time being"<<endl;

  if(file1.is_open()) //Check if open
  {
    /*
    while (!file1.eof())
    {
      getline (file1,line); - NOT POSSIBLE because of ofstream
      cout << line << endl;
    }
    */
  }
  file1.close(); //Close file1

  cout<<"\nFile 2 operations - Reading from Hello.txt"<<endl;
  ifstream file2; //INPUT file stream
  file2.open("Hello.txt"); //Open the file
  if(file2.is_open()) //Check if open
  {
    while (!file2.eof())
    {
      getline (file2,line);
      cout << line << endl;
    }
  }
  file2.close(); //Close file2


  cout<<"\nFile 3 operations - Appending and Reading from Hello.txt"<<endl;
  fstream file3; //INPUT file stream
  file3.open("Hello.txt", ios::in | ios::out); //Open the file
  if(file3.is_open()) //Check if open
  {
    //We want to put a new line at the end of the file
    file3.seekp(0, ios::end);
    file3 << "This is new line added file 3"<<endl;
    //Now reset the file pointer to the start of the file
    file3.seekg(0, ios::beg);
    while (!file3.eof())
    {
      getline (file3,line);
      cout << line << endl;
    }
  }
  file3.close(); //Close file3

  return 0;
}

The output is as follows:

C String and C++ Strings: Similarities and Differences

I came across this scenario recently when a C style string (as some people refer to char[] as) had to be compared to a C++ string and even though this is straightforward, i fell in the same trap as a lot of people about forgetting that there is a Nul charachter as the end of C style string. Anyway, here is an example to demonstrate both the strings.

//Program tested on Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 - Zahid Ghadialy
//Program to demonstrate length and size of char* and string
//and to show similarity and difference between them
#include<iostream>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
  cout<<endl;
  char a[10]="Hello";
  cout<<"Size of a = "<<sizeof(a)<<endl;
  a[5]='\0'; //Terminating the C string in between with Nul character
  cout<<"Size of a = "<<sizeof(a)<<endl;

  cout<<endl;
  char b[]="Hello";
  cout<<"Size of b = "<<sizeof(b)<<endl; //Note the size
                                         //Automatic Nul charachter added

  cout<<endl;
  string c("Hello");
  cout<<"Size of c = "<<sizeof(c)<<endl;
  cout<<"Length of c = "<<c.length()<<endl;

  c += " Zahid";
  cout<<"Size of modified c = "<<sizeof(c)<<endl;
  cout<<"Length of modified c = "<<c.length()<<endl;

  //Add an extra NULL charachter
  cout<<endl;
  char d[]="Hello\0";
  cout<<"Size of d = "<<sizeof(d)<<endl;
  for(int i = 0; i < sizeof(d); i++)
  {
    cout<<"d["<<i<<"] = "<<d[i]<<endl;
  }

  //When is a char[] similar to string?
  cout<<endl;
  char e[]="Zahid";
  string f = "Zahid\0";
  const char* temp = f.c_str();
  if(strcmp(e , temp) == 0)
  {
    cout<<"e == f"<<endl;
  }
  else
  {
    cout<<"e != f"<<endl;
  }

  return 0;
}

The output is as follows:

Creating specialised strings using 'find_first_not_of'

Sometimes we want to create specialised strings that have a particular characteristic. For example a BitString that can only contain '0' and '1'. Or we may want to create a Hex String that can contain '0-9' and 'a-f'. We can also define other specialised types like numeric strings, octal strings, etc. The main thing would be to check to make sure that the string only contains valid characters. We can do this basic check using find_first_not_of function.

Here is a simple program to show its use:

//Program tested on Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 - Zahid Ghadialy
//Program to test specialised strings

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

bool checkIfBitString(string testString)
{
  return (testString.find_first_not_of("01?") == std::string::npos);
}

bool checkIfHexString(string testString)
{
  return (testString.find_first_not_of("0123456789aAbBcCdDeEfF?") == std::string::npos);
}

int main()
{
  cout<<endl;
  string str1("010011000111010101");

  if(checkIfBitString(str1))
    cout<<"str1 is a BitString"<<endl;
  else
    cout<<"str1 is not a BitString"<<endl;

  if(checkIfHexString(str1))
    cout<<"str1 can also be a HexString"<<endl;
  else
    cout<<"str1 is not a HexString"<<endl;

  cout<<endl;
  string str2("010aBcDeF345678010101");

  if(checkIfBitString(str2))
    cout<<"str2 is a BitString"<<endl;
  else
    cout<<"str2 is not a BitString"<<endl;

  if(checkIfHexString(str2))
    cout<<"str2 is a HexString"<<endl;
  else
    cout<<"str2 is not a HexString"<<endl;

  cout<<endl;
  string str3("Banana");

  if(checkIfBitString(str3))
    cout<<"str3 is a BitString"<<endl;
  else
    cout<<"str3 is not a BitString"<<endl;

  if(checkIfHexString(str3))
    cout<<"str3 is a HexString"<<endl;
  else
    cout<<"str3 is not a HexString"<<endl;

  return 0;
}

The output is as follows:

The challenging 'Infinite loop' problem

Picked this one up from The C++ blog.

Consider the following program:

#include <iostream>

int main()
{
    int i;
    int array[4];
    for(i=0; i<=8; i++)
    {
        array[i]=0;
    }

  return 0;
}

Most people including myself expect this program to crash. This is not the case. The reason being the way everything is stored on stack. In simple representation, the storage is something like this:



So when i = 6, value of i is reset to 0 and the loop continues forever.

After digging some information on stack, heap, etc. I found some useful info in C++ in 24 hours:

Programmers generally deal with five areas of memory:

• Global name space
• The free store (a.k.a. Heap)
• Registers
• Code space
• The stack

Local variables are on the stack, along with function parameters. Code is in code space, of course, and global variables are in global name space. The registers are used for internal housekeeping functions, such as keeping track of the top of the stack and the instruction pointer. Just about all remaining memory is given over to the free store, which is sometimes referred to as the heap.

The problem with local variables is that they don't persist. When the function returns, the local variables are thrown away. Global variables solve that problem at the cost of unrestricted access throughout the program, which leads to the creation of code that is difficult to understand and maintain. Putting data in the free store solves both of these problems.

You can think of the free store as a massive section of memory in which thousands of sequentially numbered cubbyholes lie waiting for your data. You can't label these cubbyholes, though, as you can with the stack. You must ask for the address of the cubbyhole that you reserve and then stash that address away in a pointer.

The stack is cleaned automatically when a function returns. All the local variables go out of scope, and they are removed from the stack. The free store is not cleaned until your program ends, and it is your responsibility to free any memory that you've reserved when you are done with it.

The advantage to the free store is that the memory you reserve remains available until you explicitly free it. If you reserve memory on the free store while in a function, the memory is still available when the function returns.

The advantage of accessing memory in this way, rather than using global variables, is that only functions with access to the pointer have access to the data. This provides a tightly controlled interface to that data, and it eliminates the problem of one function changing that data in unexpected and unanticipated ways.

For this to work, you must be able to create a pointer to an area on the free store and to pass that pointer among functions. The pointer is created using new and once you are done with it you can free the memory using delete.

Reading string via cin and flushing input buffers

The following program shows three different approaches to read string via Cin. It also shows two different approaches for flushing input buffer.

//Program tested on Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 - Zahid Ghadialy
//Program to read input string and to flush input buffer
#include<iostream>
#include<string>
#include <istream>
#include <limits>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
  string s1;
  cout << "\nAPPROACH 1" <<endl;
  cout << "Input a string : ";
  cin >> s1;
  cout << "Entered string = " <<s1.c_str()<<endl;

  //Lets flush the buffer from Approach 1 here
  istream& in(cin);
  in.ignore( numeric_limits<std::streamsize>::max(), '\n' );

  cout << "\nAPPROACH 2" <<endl;
  cout << "Input a string : ";
  istreambuf_iterator<char> eos;  // end-of-range iterator
  istreambuf_iterator<char> iit (cin.rdbuf()); // stdin iterator
  string s2; 
  while (iit!=eos && *iit!='\n') s2+=*iit++;
  cout << "Entered string = " << s2 << endl;

  //Another approach for flushing the input
  int ch;
  while ((ch = cin.get()) != '\n' && ch != EOF);

  cout << "\nAPPROACH 3" <<endl;
  cout << "Input a string : ";
  char buf[BUFSIZ];
  if (cin.getline(buf, sizeof(buf)))
  {
    cout << "Entered string = " << buf << endl;
  }

  cout << endl;
  return 0;
}

The output is as follows:



More information:

• FAQ: How Do I flush input buffer
• How do I flush input stream
• istreambuf_iterator

Using #pragma message directive

Sometimes you would like to remind the user or yourself of something while compiling and there is an option to remind yourself using the #pragma message directive. See the following program:

//Program tested on Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 - Zahid Ghadialy
//Program to show how to remember things using #pragma message
#include<iostream>

using namespace std;

int someFunction(int a=0, int b=0)
{
#pragma message("TODO: Coding of someFunction()")
  return 0;
}

int main()
{
  someFunction();
  return 0;
}

In this case the user wants to remind himself that someFunction() needs to be coded at a later time and hence he uses a preprocessor message statement. The result is when compilation is done, a message will be output as shown below:

Using Preprocessor Statements #ifdef, #elif, #else and #endif

Sometimes it becomes necessary to write two (or more) different peices of behaviour in a common code. Depending of its mode/place/time/version the behaviour has to be changed. It can be done by the use of simple preprocessor statements. Consider the following program:

//Program tested on Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 - Zahid Ghadialy
//Program to show use of preprocessor macros for dynamic behaviour

#include<iostream>
#include<string>

using namespace std;

#define USE_CAR //Comment or Uncomment this if using preprocessor option

int main()
{
  int someNum = 3;
#ifdef USE_CAR
  string modeOfTransport("Use a Car");
#elif USE_BUS
  string modeOfTransport("Use a Bus");
#elif USE_TRAIN
  string modeOfTransport("Use a Train");
#else
  string modeOfTransport("Use any mode of transport");
#endif

  cout<<"Mode of Transport = "<<modeOfTransport<<" and someNum = "<<someNum<<endl;

  return 0;
}

The output is as follows:

In the program above, the statement in the start #define USE_CAR says that the code with USE_CAR should be used during compile time. Instead if USE_BUS is defined, that particular peice of code will be used. If nothing is defined then the behaviour with else will be used.

There is another way to use these preprocessor directives. It is by defining in the properties below. If defined this way then the statement should be omitted from the main program.

The output is as follows in this case:

For more information see this.